Impact of International Regimes on Nature of States

Impact of Inter guinea pig Regimes on Nature of StatesTo what extent rump transnational regimes tilt the record of carrys interactions and go out a ancestor to intra- verbalize fights?AbstractIn this essay, I am literary argument that the international regimes rat cause a limited change to the nature of the subjects because of the land sovereignty and legitimacy. However, it is hard to distinguish the limit of the change of the handed-down disk operating system by the influence of the international regimes. For example if a realm wants to beat a particle of European Union or Schengen concord has to meets the requirements of the cheek. Usually if the country is not meeting the requirement, the organisation is giving a deadline to the country to do some reforms and developments in the judicature. The limit of the brass is that the give in puke decide to not follow their rules and simply to not become a member. According to Krasners definition, regime is more th an than set of rules presupposed a high level of institutionalization (Saideman, S. and Zahar, Marie-Joelle, (2008) Intra-state Conflict, Governments and pledge Routledge). International regimes be globalized and interconnected. The international organizations ar challenging the state sovereignty and assume an impact on it in realms as security, economy, environment and culture. International organizations throw out be a declaration for intra-state state of wars. Other resolutenesss can be self-help, democratization, guarantor, the use of military forces to decrease the personnel, elites, trim down all types of inequality etc.Introduction globoseization as a feature of international regimes is challenging the traditional governance and it is weakening it process. Countries argon depending on each other and every little change in a particular country may lead to a world(a) transformation because of increasing globalization and high interconnectedness. The International re gimes have outlet on the policy decision-making and argon monitoring the policy implementation. Each politicsal theory has a diametric view approximately the effect of the international regimes. The Civil company concept and the international organizations such as non- governmental organizations (NGOs) and non-profitable organizations (NPOs) ar advocating valet rights, explaining to people why voting is important and giving them more clear vision of the world. The international regimes regulate the world beyond state borders. The regimes can change the state sovereignty done international organizations rules can have influence to the state by obliging society, NGOs, pressure mathematical companys etc. precisely cannot bespeak decisions instead of the state governance or to run the policy-making process. If a state is a member of a certain organization (UN, NATO, EU etc.) the state has to face the elaborateness requirements and to follow the rules of the organization. Each member has the same rights equality in voting, rights to pronounce up, benefits etc. there is no separatism amongst the states (small, monstrous, poor, rich countries). The state sovereignty cannot be changed, because there is no angiotensin converting enzyme that can take decisions but the governance. No one can forcibly shuffling the government to reform the policy or do any other reclamation (political, social, economy, environmental etc.). If the state disagrees to follow the rules of the organization it cannot become its member, but its a state decision to become or not a member of a certain organization.The role of United NationsFounded after the human War , The United Nations purpose is to prevent wars and to create a steady-going environment for the people. The main UN aims argon world peace, minimizing poverty, human rights, freedom and puzzle out environmental events. Shortly, the UN has an impact on political, economic and environmental realms. Members of the UN have a sovereign equality and the right to vote whether is rich, poor, small or big country. All members must support, help the UN and follow the rules. One of the rules is to avoid use force, to advance a peaceful environment and to solve the differences through dialogs or other peaceful methods. The role of one of the principles organs the UN Security Council is to keep the world peace and to solve international security issues. The Security Council has 15 members, 5 permanent and 10 other countries changing every devil years. The five permanent countries, the Great Powers (China, France, Russia, the UK, and the US) have veto power, which means, the decision can be taken if and only if all of the members agree if even one of the five countries disagrees the decision is going to be blocked. The Great Powers decisions can change each member sovereignty trough changing the organization record or reforming the rules. The UN is constructed by sovereign states, so for exampl e actions about depot agreement depend on the UN members, so they atomic number 18 controlling the agendum entirely.The spheric Civil night club and NGOsThe Global Civil society is a norm of the good, protection and a voice for the voiceless. The main contexts are private autonomy, self-organization, globalization and global interconnectedness thereof global civil society is more transnational rather than domestic. The Civil society is proclaiming human rights, moral, humans development etc. They are supporting those which rights and voice are limited or do not have at all, because freedom is one of the main features of the society concept. The Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and the non-profitable organizations (NPOs) are usually linked up with volunteering and charity. They are independent from the government and they rely on their own funds. The NGOs can work in every levelregional, national or international. Usually, the NGOs are private and that means they are alw ays working for profit (opposite governmental working for the society good) but all these NGOs, NPOs, Civil society are Private but non profitable, so all of them are working for improving humans life, proclaiming human rights, moral valuables, integration, environmental and cultural issues.The Intra state wars solutionBefore finding the right solutions of the intra-state wars, we have to be clear about the concept and how the intra-state war follows. At first, we have to know the difference between the intra-state war and the inter-state war. The intra-state war is between citizens of one country, they can be antithetical ethnic groups, to have dissimilar views about a certain issue etc. Usually, the difference leads to madness between the state army and the non-state group or groups (terrorist organizations or rebels). The conflict is affecting only the country but it is possible to have international effect. Interstate war is a conflict between two or more states, which are using their national military forces against each other in an aggressive and violent way.The intra-state wars occur in a particular state between their citizens. There are several reasons why intra-state wars occur. A reason can be different points of view about elections or how the state has to be run by the government. The reason can be related to occupying a part of the state by a particular group or assay to devise a certain area independent. Also, it can be about political or governance reformation. It is possible intra-state war to occur between moral principle and religion groups based on cultural, religion and economic differences. The Civil wars are long lasting and usually end up with a make out of deaths and used resources which is a benefit for the country producing weapons.In 19th and twentieth century, the intra-state wars have been decreased because of the centralized governments. The Great Powers (UK, Habsburg Austria, Prussia, France, and Russia) have been invo lved in the conflicts by supporting the running government with the purpose to prevent violence escalation and to stop the war.Every case of war has different actors, concepts, issues and respectively different. The usual thing is that each government has to think about the security of the state citizens. That is important because that would prevent mass murders and radical violence between the groups which are involved in. One of the main government obligation is to provide a safe and secure environment (Saideman, S. and Zahar, Marie-Joelle (2008) Intra-state Conflict, Governments and Security Routledge), to protect each group in the state and to decrease the violence to a minimum.According to (Saideman, S. and Zahar, Marie-Joelle (2008) Intra-state Conflict, Governments and Security Routledge) the civil war can be resolved by the national elites. The Elites can withdraw the mass attention to a less real issue for the purpose of governmental faults or issues that politicians wan t to avoid. Also, the elites can try to divide each group based on nationalism, religion, melt etc. so their support would be limited and the government would have more power to control the citizens and their actions. Other solutions can be trying to reduce the inequality or to improve the global norms about the violence usage between humans. The violence must be minimized that would make negotiations easier. Other option is a tierce side a state guarantor, which is not directly linked with the war to use force to urge both sides to agreement. Democratization is a solution, as well, because it is impossible a war to occur between two or more democratic states, thus it is impossible in one democratic state to occur a civil war.ConclusionInternational regimes can change the nature of states through international organization rules but limited because of the state sovereignty. International regimes can have impact on political, social, environmental, economy, cultural, technologica l realms. Each international organization has different level of influence to the state, different set of rules and requirements for participation. Thus when a country is joining an organization usually is doing reformations according to the particular organization set of rules and laws. They can have influence to the wars and to resolve the problem with them. In a civil war they can play the role of the third side (guarantor) and to use force to make agreement between the argument sides. Democratization is other way to prevent wars because the democratic concept rejects the war as a method to resolve problems. Both democratic and spacious views collaborate by the idea of achieving agreement between belligerents by negotiations. Although the regeneration of wars solution wars still occurs, that means one thing no solution is 100% effective, each case of war needs a narrow consideration and precise actions.BibliographyAnheier, H., Glasius M., and Kaldor, M. Introducing Global Ci vil Society. Online. Available at http//www.lse.ac.uk/internationalDevelopment/ explore/CSHS/civilSociety/yearBook/chapterPdfs/2001/chapter01.pdfAnheier, Helmut K., 1954- (2001). Global civil society yearbook. Oxford Oxford University call forth Chapter 2004/5 Global Civil Society A Sceptical View Online. Available at https//vle.york.ac.uk/bbcswebdav/institution/Electronic%20Texts/ government/Introduction%20to%20International%20Politics%20%5BYxxxx-002303%5D/92842%20%20Global%20Civil%20Society%20A%20Sceptical%20View.pdfBaylis, (2005). The globalisation of World Politics. Third edition. New York Oxford University PressGemmill, Barbara and Bamidele-Izu, Abimbola The Role of NGOs and Civil Society in Global Environmental Governance. Online. Available athttp//www.env-net.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/gemmill.pdfHasenclever, A., Mayer P. and Rittberger, V. Theories of international regimes Andreas. Cambridge University Press Online. Available at http//graduateinstitute.ch/files/live/ sites/iheid/files/sites/political_science/users/elena.gadjanova/public/Theories%20of%20international%20regimes0001.pdfHeywood, Andrew (2011). Global politics. Palgrave Macmillan Chapter 3 Theories of Global Politics Online. Available atKaldor, Mary (2003). Global civil society. jurisprudence Press Chapter Chapter 1 Online. Available at https//vle.york.ac.uk/bbcswebdav/institution/Electronic%20Texts/Politics/Introduction%20to%20International%20Politics%20%5BYxxxx-002303%5D/92807%20Global%20civil%20society%20pp.1-14.pdfhttps//vle.york.ac.uk/bbcswebdav/institution/Electronic%20Texts/Politics/Introduction%20to%20International%20Politics%20%5BYxxxx-002303%5D/85351%20Global%20politics%20pp.53-82.pdfRotberg, 2002, Failed States in a World of Terror, Foreign Affairs, vol. 81, issue 4, pp. 127-140 Online. Available at http//web.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.york.ac.uk/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?sid=5b5633bb-65ff-4bc0-9268-41e527b8212d%40sessionmgr4002vid=2hid=4101Saideman, S. M. and Zahar, Marie-Jo elle. (2008) Intra-state Conflict, Governments and Security. Routledge