Health Care System: Private or Public Essay

Main Argument Is Americas heartyness- compassionate system better than Canadas? Thoresen, S. T. , & handle, A. (2011). Universal wellness veneration in Thailand Concerns among the health c atomic number 18 workforce. Health Policy, 99(1), 17-22. Retrieved from https//0-www-clinicalkey-com. catalog. lib. cmich. edu/ Stian H. Thoresen and Angela handle, authors of the obligate Universal health cover in Thailand Concerns among the health c atomic number 18 workforce, write ab surface the disputable topic of unexclusive health carry on from the Thai health pity professionals perspective.The article is based off of interviews with health deal out professionals who work in dealing with patients who atomic number 18 covered by creation health dispense. integrity quote, Health financial aid professionals at general hospitals, particularly in clownish areas, have experienced up to a doubling in the spot of daily out-patients many with superficial symptoms, is what Thore sen and Fielding were under the impression of aft(prenominal) the interviews. They also followed up with some other quote stating, While the improved approach to health care provisions was welcomed, questions regarding the appropriateness of seeking medical checkup advice were raised.This item article is perfect for my topic in a number of ways. Thoresen and Fielding exercise up their findings perfectly because they use their interviews with professionals who work in public health care to back up their argument. This would be a slap-up source for my account because not only is it a real spiritedness example of public health care, it is another country with public health care which would lay down that the turn on is to not bash the Canadian health care system, but to show an international comparison.The two authors stated, There are potentials for health care professionals to congregate in the private sector and urban areas where workloads are perceived to be less demanding . Relating back to a anterior quote, it was understood that public health care equals more health care facilities populated with patients, whereas with private, it seems it is not so crowded which empennage lead whiz to believe that patients are only seeking care when absolutely needed. Thoresen and Fielding bring up a debatable argument that is universal to alone (private and public health care owners) and present their findings appropriately.Funds have been send in place to build what he explained as a public-private union. This type of health care system is all made practicable because of a philanthropy type shop from different organizations. Dolan explains, The fund result rely on $87 million in loans from Morgan Stanley in step in for tax credits to build 500 new affordable living accommodations units and eight new health centers serving 75,000 people. Dolans article, U. S. news Public-private fund aims at health care, housing gap, would fit in my report as an exa mple how people can make the best out of private health care.Private versus public health care is so controversial due to the point that one party, whether it be the patients or professionals, are going to suffer expense wise. Of course private health care is more costly for the average person than public health care Dolan explains a way for both the people of private health care, as well as health care services to get a fair end of the deal. He explains the idea well due to the fact that solves the problem by bringing up an existing way to benefactor out with private health care. Quotes from this article could easily be include into the topic of my paper.Dolan, rather than a farfetched idea like shimmy to private health care overnight, approaches the argument with more encouragement. Culyer, A. J. (1989). The normative economic science of health care finance and provision. Oxford Journals, 5(1), 34-58. A. J. Culyer, writer of the article The normative economics of health care finance and provision, better explains many exquisite points of public health care. Culyer explains that while many believe that public health care comes along with a lot of excess spending, the real crisis is the underfunding.Since the political sympathies acts as the main source of funding for health care, it actually can work against the common good of the people. A. J. states that the concern of underfunding has given rise to bring up proposals for reform which includes a greater role for private insurance, out-of-pocket payments, and private health care. Although A. J. Culyers article is wrote in response to the medical crisis of the UK, it still would act as a great example to show positive aspects of private health care.It is dependable that many believe that public health care has a lot of excess spending, but apparently, a big problem in this particular type of health care is the underfunding. Culyers article would be crucial in my paper because he proposes another examp le that would make one question public health care. It is true that the government is the main source of funds in public health care, but when assets are going towards other organizations as well money can become split up and threatened. Culyer incorporates this idea without attack off too strong, but rather makes the public health care system questionable.Berman, M. (n. d. ). Although the main focus has been the benefits of private health care, Micah Berman offers insight on why public health care works for some countries. This article is written specifically on focuses of the U. S. health care reform in 2011.The cost of medical care in the U. S. and the Affordable Act of 2010 are two of the main topics discussed in the article. The authors main point is that the U. S. should focus on the prevention of chronic disease, instead of treatment when those diseases appear. Berman sincerely believes that this type of reform would cut medical costs drastically. The point of my paper is n ot to come off demanding but informational with many sources which is why another side to the health care system is essential. Micah Berman has one quote in the article that really caught my attention, We dont have a health care system in America.We have a sick care system. If you get sick, you get care. But precious little is spent to withstand people healthy in the first place. It may be true that the U. S. has some of the best health care services and technology in the world, but it may also have some of the most demanding patients as well. People seem to be so focused on what types of symptomatic a better health care, or in their hopes, a cheaper health care, would have, that they forget to take care of themselves in the process.