Existentialism and Metamorphosis Essay

Existentialism is defined as a modern philosophical movement stressing the importance of cardinals experience and accountability. Its focus is the make on the personal reflections that these make on the individual, who is seen as a free agent in a deterministic and seemingly meaningless universe. Its philosophy is meticulous that, in a nutshell, advocates a diverse arsenal of responses and solutions to the existentialist attitude which, essentially, is what an individual feels when confronted by the silliness of liveliness. Throughout humanity, rumination and self-proclaimed ultimate truths have assumed various forms poetry, religion, and legion(predicate) other doctrines and textual fails.In The Metamorphosis, Franz Kafka narrates the ramifications of a metamorphosis in which the font and protagonist, a man named Gregor Samsa, is change into a bug. Despite the novellas literary methods and influences, the most prominent being the way Kafka so nervelessly describes such irr egularity in his life, The Metamorphosis is also hailed as a prime textual work of existentialism, the previously mentioned philosophical movement. Both foregoing and subsequent to the transformation, Kafka portrays Gregor as a man who seems lost within himself, and absentminded identity. The reminiscences of his past are neither nostalgic nor poignant his human life is seen to revolve solely around trivial matters. His social life pays the expenditure from this, his failure to assert a concrete and consistent humans.The extent of his drop of individuality is further exemplified by his reaction to the metamorphosis finding himself transformed in his bed into a gigantic insect (Kafka, 296), he prioritizes work over all else, scour in his newly equated insect form. Furthermore, he panics because the next train went at seven oclock to start that he would need to hurry like mad and his samples werent even packed up (297). Gregors identity crisis is a device for transport Kafkas belief of an impersonal society where individualism is drastically mitigate as a result of excessive materialism. Gregor, in the context of Fyodor Dostoyevskys Notes from Underground analogy, would be the ant in the anthill thus version his metamorphosis ironically. A nonher dominant theme prevalent throughout the novella is the absurd situation Gregor is confronted by.These nonsensical happenings (296-327) reflect the world as seen from the existentialist perspective a world absent of a rational and omnibus(prenominal) objective. Jean-Paul Sartre postulated that every existing thing is born without reason, prolongs itself out of weakness, and dies by fortune. This meaninglessness is precisely what Gregor is victim to in the microcosm of society that Kafka generates Gregor flounders about, beleaguered by silliness and helplessness, presumably because he is unaware of Nietzsche and Kierkegaards somewhat consoling conclusions that one must(prenominal) devise meaning for ones own existence ex nihilo. Once again, Kafka utilizes a combination of plot and character to make his angst concerning an apparently pointless existence.Freedom or rather the lack thereof is another existentialist tenet that Kafka addresses. Gregor is depicted as someone laboured by self-imposed burdens, the most demanding being the role as the pecuniary pillar of the family. Despite having the freedom to repudiate this role, Gregor instead pursues it with feverish forwardness to the extent that it becomes his sole desire (310). Yet his harangue regarding his career (297-298) reveals that this is not due to personal desire, but rather the belief that he must replace his father financially, regardless of preference.Gregors delusion regarding an absence of weft contradicts what Kafka perceives as the truth that freedom is ubiquitous in spite of some(prenominal) ethical obligations we may be expected to adhere to, and that the individual defines his or herself via ones decisions. A qu asi-motto of existentialism coined by Sartre, existence precedes fragrance. In conclusion, Kafka employs the fictional literary elements he constructs to address the very non-fictional, existentialist aspects of society and life. Akin to Dostoyevskys Notes from Underground, it can be interpreted as both a rumination and tirade against impersonal communities, restriction of freedom, and the absurdity of life.